Get A Free Consultation

With NJ’s Best Personal Injury Legal Team.

Call Now 📞

908-232-7666


Tricks Lawyers Use In Depositions

Tricks lawyers use in depositions - lawyer asking questions during a deposition with legal documents on desk

During depositions, lawyers employ various tactics to influence the outcome, from manipulating document presentations to using strategic objections and controlling witness testimony. This article explores the most common tricks lawyers use, helping you understand their purpose and how to handle them effectively during legal proceedings.

Common Deposition Tactics

Witness responding to lawyer's questions during tense deposition setting

In the realm of legal warfare, depositions represent one of the most pivotal battlegrounds. Here, an attorney collects critical insights into the case via questioning of the deponent before trial.

It’s a strategic arena where attorneys use a range of well-practiced tactics to gather constructive testimony, confirm previously inferred facts, or identify potential weak points in the opposition’s assertions.

To navigate through this complex and often stressful process, prepping efficiently is essential. “Prepare for your deposition” is a common advice that an attorney will give, ensuring the client or the deponent is ready for lines of inquiry that the opposing counsel may probe.

Additionally, an experienced lawyer would apply timely objections to defend their client from misleading or irrelevant lines of questioning.

The attorney may also coach the deponent on how to answer the question concisely, ensuring decisiveness and clarity in their testimony.

Misleading Document Presentations

Lawyer questioning a nervous witness in a professional office with bookshelves and legal certificates

In the complex web of the deposition process, a tool often used by seasoned attorneys is the presentation of documents in a misleading manner.

These documents, ranging from emails and contracts to medical records, can be used to confuse or misdirect the deponent, resulting in a skewed testimony that could affect the outcome of the litigation.

It is, therefore, essential to know how to navigate through this obstacle to prepare for trial effectively.

During the deposition, the court reporter creates a transcript that captures every word uttered under oath, bearing legal weight equivalent to courtroom testimony.

If a confusing or ambiguous document is presented, it is crucial to instruct the deponent not to rush to answer a question. They should take the time to clarify all aspects of the document thoroughly before they respond.

This tactic, combined with a solid understanding of the lawsuit dynamics, can help you get an accurate and beneficial deposition transcript.

• The attorney should encourage the deponent to read aloud the whole document or at least significant sections of it. This can help in ensuring that all parties involved have a clear understanding of what is being discussed.

• It’s also advisable to ask for breaks during the deposition process if needed, especially when dealing with complicated documents. These breaks will allow the deponent time to digest and comprehend complex information.

• If a document seems irrelevant or unrelated to the case, be sure to challenge its inclusion in the deposition. Not every piece of evidence presented by opposing counsel may be pertinent or admissible.

• Make use of experts where necessary. If a document contains technical jargon or industry-specific language that isn’t easily understandable, consider bringing in an expert witness who can explain these terms clearly.

In conclusion, while misleading documents can pose challenges during depositions, they are not insurmountable obstacles with careful preparation and strategy.

• Always remember that clarity is key – both in understanding each document and communicating your responses effectively.

• Be thorough but concise when explaining your understanding or interpretation of any given document.

• Finally, always consult with your attorney before responding to questions about potentially confusing documents – their expertise could make all the difference between success and failure in these situations.

Objection Strategies

Legal documents and deposition recorder as lawyer conducts questioning

Devising successful deposition strategies involves an intricate understanding of the subtleties employed in legal proceedings.

This understanding extends to the judicious use of objections, a tactic defense attorneys often manipulate. Here, the primary aim is to control the unfolding of the deposition testimony, ensuring the witness does not testify to issues that may harm their case.

Additionally, objections provide an opportunity for clarification, guarding against the common tricks lawyers use in depositions such as confusing phrases or misrepresenting facts.

Integrating an exhibit into the proceeding marks another aspect of a meticulously planned deposition strategy.

Defense attorneys, for instance, will tactically use the document to provoke a desired answer to a question, thereby directing the narrative toward their intended route.

The expertise and knowledge of the legal domain, in a broader sense, and the operational guidelines specific to the case, contribute to the successful navigation of a deposition LLC.

The dynamics of this approach encapsulate how a skilled attorney can balance objecting to inappropriate questioning with maintaining the flow of the deposition.

Using Privileged Information

In the realm of the legal system, especially during depositions, attorneys will use a variety of tactics to ensure a favorable outcome for their client’s case.

One such strategy is the utilization of privileged information during the deposition. This tactic involves a lawyer using sensitive or classified details known only to the witness or deponent.

The deponent’s truthful response to this technique can often turn the tides in the favor of the attorney’s client, making this method highly effective.

Though the utilization of privileged information might seem intimidating to a novice deponent, understanding this concept and preparing for it is an essential part of the tips for depositions.

When the deponent is asked a series of questions, the witness should be prepared to face questions that might touch on classified areas.

However, under the counsel of a knowledgeable lawyer, the witness’s rights to privileged information can be protected.

The following tips would be helpful for the witness to navigate such scenarios: understand your rights, refrain from volunteering extra information, and only give an answer when certain about the truthfulness.

Time-Stalling Techniques

Deposition process with lawyer and uncertain witness in office setting

Regardless of whether the deposition is taking place in a lawyer’s office or courtroom, the imposing environment tends to rattle inexperienced witnesses’.

Savvy attorneys leverage this nervousness, deploying time-stalling techniques ingeniously built to make the witness overly cautious and thus, slower in their responses.

This tactic can prove especially effective when the case’s specifics are intricate, compelling the individuals involved to recount dense details over extended periods.

It’s crucial, therefore, for witnesses and their lawyers to ‘not let’ these tactics detract from the ultimate goal of providing a clear, concise deposition.

To combat these tactics, witnesses need to exercise patience and refrain from rushing into answers.

Ensure you listen attentively, taking the time to fully ‘understand the question’ before forming a response. This allows the witness to accurately interpret not just the ‘facts of your case,’ but also the intent behind the ‘questions asked.’

Be mindful to provide precise answers to stave off an onslaught of ‘follow-up questions,’ which can cause tension and result in vague and confusing testimonies.

An informed attorney’s counsel and guidance can greatly help to ‘conduct effective’ communication and handle an adversary’s time-stalling techniques.

Controlling Witness Testimony

A deposition requires the witness to stay calm and composed to ensure an accurate record by the court reporter.

The skills used in managing the testimony of a witness are crucial for both the side representing the witness and the attorney representing the other side.

If the opposing attorney asks confusing or complex questions, it can generate responses that may lead to issues in the case at hand.

One tactic to circumvent this is to confidently ask for clarification, ensuring all parties have a shared understanding of the information being addressed.

In this process, any inconsistency in the witness’s statement can critically affect the case, both outside of court and later at trial.

The attorneys work to elicit pertinent information that supports their case, using strategic questioning to expose any weaknesses in the testimony.

Yet being deposed can be mentally taxing for the witness, and it is critical to remember that the proceedings are not personal but rather a routine part of building a comprehensive understanding of the case at hand.

Questions Beyond Discovery

In the realm of the litigation process, the focus often rests upon the rights and responsibilities of deponents.

Privileged with the right to read and assess their depositions, these participants are given their statements under oath. They are encouraged to construe their statements in a clear, concise manner to ensure the information disclosed matches their original intentions.

This capacity not only protects their interests but can also be used by the attorneys as a step in their line of inquiry.

Legal advice flow aplenty for deponents who are so often at the center of this complex process.

Many attorneys stress the importance of confidentiality and the need for their clients to fully understand their obligations and rights in this context.

They work meticulously with their deponents to not only answer discovery questions but also to uncover aspects that may have been previously overlooked or undervalued.

This expanded inquiry, beyond standard discovery, has proven to be a crucial component for many breakthroughs within the litigation process.

Recess and Continuance Requests

Expert attorneys often utilize a practical legal strategy that is crucial during heated deposition battles – the tactic of requesting a recess or continuance.

This may occur when the opposing party presents new, unexpected evidence or lines of questioning. An attorney deems it necessary to take some time to meticulously evaluate the fresh information to adeptly adapt and plan their response.

During this period, they can reassess their approach, explore the intricacy linked to the document or claim in question, and adequately prepare for the next round of deposition.

At times, a recess or continuance request may prompt an objection from the opposing attorney who is keen on maintaining the litigation’s momentum.

However, this delay tactic isn’t just about buying time. It’s about meticulous research, formulation of effective characterizations, and strategic recalibration of the advocate’s approach.

While it’s true that such requests may elongate proceedings and rates may climb, in many cases, they can help resolve issues more efficiently in the long run.

Long recesses provide room for settlement discussions, making this deposition technique beneficial even outside courtrooms.

Contact Lord, Kobrin, Alvarez, and Fattell for a FREE consultation.
Our dedicated team is ready to fight for your rights.
908-232-7666
TAP TO CALL

Start typing and press Enter to search